I am not sure if the uptightness is inborn or influenced by social and cultural factors but I know I have always been critical of many things, or of things in general. It has helped me perform ethically (especially in my line of work in the media and the academe) and it has forced me to point out "wrongs" for correction and laud the "rights."
When I entered the University, I was overjoyed that I would be part of a tradition of critical thinking, doing and analysis. This helped sharpen my quest for excellence in everything that I did, from cooking chicken tinola to writing up scripts. Everything conceptualized must be questioned, everything done must be "right;" cover all your bases, and confront any criticisms that may be hurled at you, head on.
But as I grew up, and as I grew in my career, I realized that, criticism and questioning need not always precede every endeavor. Not everything is universally right, and no one is universally wrong. I learned, the most important thing to do first is accept what is, and learn from it, before shooting something down.This isn't to say I've given up on being critical. I've learned that all you can do is simply do your best work, do it with joy and with regard for others' own contributions and the good of a wider public. The Web, which has become my area of study interest, presumes nothing is right, no one has a monopoly of good or bad, and welcomes everyone to make a contribution. No one is "shot down" unless projects are obviously harmful to fellow netizens. Everyone is a contributor to another's success. The virtual communities are there to offer support and a safe, open playground for ideas to develop and grow.
This is why I am surprised at how some individuals -- students and apparently even PhD's -- immediately slammed my students' online buzz campaign for the UAAP Cheerdance Competition. They are obviously individuals who are critical. They are trained to question and study and critique.
It seems though, this is all they do. It boggles the mind how, coming from a tradition that claims to be the bastion of academic freedom and openness, these individuals choose to close their minds and dismiss good old fashioned innovative, fun and creative endeavors. Why do they have to create online arguments and deface profile pages? Why rip out campaign paraphernalia? Why do they need to negate an honest effort?I am aware that in anything one does, it will be impossible to please everyone. At the very least, though, I was expecting the people from my own University (where I chose to get my MA and turn down a high-paying job to teach the future mass media practitioners of the country) to be the community, both online and offline, that would help these innovative ideas grow. It's so disappointing to see that there are people who choose to kill honest and well-meaning projects, meant to support something we are all proud of anyway - the UP Pep Squad.
What makes me sadder
still is the realization that, based on what people close to me have commented, if this project were introduced in a university that would simply scream their colors, blue, green, red or yellow, their communities would accept and embrace the effort and idea, and see to it the endeavor was a smashing success.I've resigned myself to the fact that, that's the way it is. I can only continue doing work I have decided to concentrate on, and that is creating communities. I hope that, when the time comes for them to call on the people in their communities for support and unity, they will find it and I hope they will be spared the treatment they showed my students.
